Police and Lethal Force Essay

guard work entails expectedly many opportunities for mis utilization of authority or the excessive use of superpower which is not needful when in the line of duty (Strack 1994 ACLU 1991). This is a first issue that concerns policing and the grave and abusive conduct of men in uniform whether they ar in the unite States or elsewhere in the world (Police socialization and behavior 2008). There are various factors that are usually pointed at whenever this happens police military officers already in the brink of burn out are a primary reason. However, the mental or psychological assure of an officer is usually in question if this use of lethal force occurs. Why is this considered an issue? It is a given usually, that a police officer is familiar of the force continuum (www.policetest.info) which is a kind of scale that guides an officer in graduated level with which what method or approach will he resort to down the stairs any given circumstance (see appendix A). This shows t hat by his mere presence alone, the officer realizes, the suspect whitethorn be alerted or threatened and succeeding responses by the two individuals (i.e., if it involves two people only) are checkly again graded and evaluated by the officer according to the force continuum.Precisely because reports are aplenty concerning police heinousness which happens when a suspect is frisked and/or confronted with a twist activity and many of these instances that the persons of interest or suspects do not even have any artillery of sorts with them, nor were they in the position challenging the person in authority. The case of Rodney King in 1991 became a weapons platform for many of these reforms that were made eventually, to respond to public exclaim for justice regarding perpetrators the like of which Rodney King had suffered from. Studies show that in most organizations where reforms have been initiated, what was important was the regular monitor of the activities of police officers ensures that these men minimize their propensity to reckon the capability of employing lethal or deadly force against any citizen or any suspect unless merited. This is not just to safeguard any suspect or citizen whether they are coming from the expected marginalized groups where the most probably victims are men of color, older or ripening citizens, women and children but even these kindred men in uniform from their own tendencies to act with anger or rage and resort to these means (ACLU 1991).To serve and to harbor can mean both ways when interpret in the light of these reforms it means serving and defend the men themselves who are employed to do the same to the general public. Affirming their code of ethics now and past may be a small affaire but it is still a major destiny of reminding officers why they are in the force and the righteousness that is necessary in the deterrence of themselves committing a aversion needlessly.Appendix A The baron ContinuumMore ForceDe adly Forceless(prenominal) Lethal capsicum Spray, Baton, TaserEmpty Hand ControlVerbal CommandsLess ForceOfficer PresenceSource http//www.policetest.info/FORCE_CONTINUUM_POLICE_USE_OF_FORCE.htm whole shebang citedStrack, Lorr M.1994. Personality profile of police candidates. Journal of clinical Psychology 50(2)200-7. www.pubmed.gov._____ Police culture and behavior. Accessed March 12, 2008. American Civil Liberties Union. On the Line Police atrocity and its remedies. New York. April 1991. Retrieved March 12, 2008 http//www.aclu.org/police/gen/14614pub19971201.html_______ Police viva Boards and Use of Force Continuum. Retrieved March 12, 2008